Cost-benefit analysis of working with restoration in river management with Marxan

Cost-benefit analysis of working with restoration in river management with Marxan

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES

Front. Environmental Sciences.

Sec. Freshwater Science

Volume 12 – 2024 |

doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1425668

Provisionally accepted

  • Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published shortly.

    Given the impacts and costs of ongoing river degradation and extreme rainfall and flooding caused by climate change, improving and maintaining river health is becoming increasingly urgent to meet global sustainable development goals. Scaling up and working with nature-based solutions at regional, catchment and river corridor scales is critical. One way to achieve this is to work within a recovery-led approach to river restoration, incorporating processes of geomorphological and vegetative recovery to build river corridors in areas where they have been fragmented. Geomorphologically-informed cost-benefit analyses have not previously been conducted at either the riverine or riparian scales at the required catchment or regional scales. We applied Marxan in a novel way to conduct the first cost-benefit analysis for geomorphologically-informed restoration of river systems. We estimated that restoring 75,500km of rivers in the NSW coastal catchments will cost $8.2 billion, which compares favourably with recent insured losses from individual floods and projected future losses. We developed Marxan scenarios based on three general approaches to river management: ‘ad hoc and reactive’, ‘working with restoration’ and ‘corridors’, for current and future time periods. We found that there are significant current and future financial and non-financial benefits, as well as lower initial total and per hectare costs for restoration, by fully focusing on the ‘working with restoration’ or ‘corridors’ approaches and moving away from the ‘ad hoc and reactive’ approaches that dominate current practice. Implementing targeted restorations based on a continuous sequence of ‘corridor’ scenarios over time provides optimal holistic solutions to improve geomorphic condition and increase restoration potential at the landscape level. Our study demonstrates the use of Marxan as an accessible tool to manage the complexity of prioritisation and to implement and cost landscape-level restoration scenarios over time. Our study also demonstrates the positive off-site feedbacks that occur through multiplier effects as restorations occur and corridors are built. Geomorphologically informed decisions become more robust, transparent, cost-effective, consistent across catchments and adaptable to local circumstances and evolving river management priorities.

    Keywords:
    River corridor1, working with restoration2, cost-benefit analysis3, Marxan4, nature-based solutions5, river management6, restoration potential7, prioritization8

    Receive:
    May 10, 2024;
    Accepted:
    21 August 2024.

    Copyright:
    © 2024 Agnew, Fryirs, and Leishman. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). Use, distribution, or reproduction in other forums is permitted provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and the original publication in this journal is cited in accordance with accepted academic practice. Use, distribution, or reproduction not in accordance with these terms is not permitted.

    * Correspondence:

    Danelle Agnew, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

    Disclaimer:
    All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations or those of the publisher, editors, and reviewers. No warranty or endorsement is made by the publisher for any product reviewed in this article or for any claims made by its manufacturer.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *